BevNET.com - The beverage industry's source for product reviews, news and more -- soft drinks, energy drinks, juices, teas, bottled water and other non alcoholic beveragesYour source for Beverage News and Reviews
 

 

High Voltage Beverages sues Coca-Cola over Vault name

Posted: 9/22/2008 3:15:00 PM |   5 Comments | Post

Tagged Companies: High Voltage Beverages, Inc. | Coca Cola Company

By Matt Casey, Assistant Editor

A small beverage company has filed a trademark suit against Coca-Cola and asked a judge to order the beverage giant to remove Vault from the market.

High Voltage Beverages LLC produces Volt - primarily caffeine-enhanced sports drinks – and alleges that Vault violates their trademark because the two words sound and appear similar. Their suit, filed August 12 in the U.S. district court for the Western district of North Carolina, asks that Coke render any profits from Vault to HVB, remove Vault from the market, transfer drinkvault.com to HVB and pay for the costs of an advertising campaign to correct any confusion between the two products.

Coca-Cola did not return a request for comment on the suit, but the company could be in a tough spot, according to trademark attorney Gregg Sultan.

Sultan said courts tend to favor the plaintiff in cases involving products sold in convenience stores because, in that venue, “people aren’t thinking that much.”

Sultan said that even though Coca-Cola has used the Vault trademark since 2005, HVB filed an application for the Volt trademark in 1997 and obtained a registration for it in 2007. Therefore, if the court determines that the trademarks are confusingly similar, Coca-Cola may be forced to remove its product from the market. Additionally, Sultan said that although the names appear and sound similar, they are both dictionary words with different meanings.

“It could be a very interesting case actually,” Sultan said.

Recently-named president of HVB Bill Sipper called this a case of a big beverage company that “tried to just beat up a little guy,” and said he felt confident in his company’s chances to win the suit.

“We wouldn’t have filed it if we didn’t think it would succeed,” Sipper said.

Source: BevNET.com Staff


Copyright 2007 BevNet.com, Inc.
There are currently 5 comments on this article:
On Wednesday, September 24, 2008, Jamey said:

You got to be kidding me. Volt and Vault; HVB profits must be in trouble. If you can't beat them, sue them.

I think it is all over for HVB at this point.

IP Address: 63.200.214.188 | Report This Post
On Wednesday, September 24, 2008, John said:

Give me a break! The way the law works here is simple:
1. Who has "priority rights"? i.e.- who filed for the trademark first? It doesn't make any difference who gets their product to market first.

2. Ask your self- VOLT VAULT VOLT VAULT... Sound confusing to me...

3. Coca-Cola has plenty of lawyers. One would think that at least one of them might have done enough research to see if there was another similar brand name out there before making multi-million dollar product launch. This information is a matter of public record easily available online...

BTW- the courts NEVER allow side by side comparisons in confusingly similar trademark cases, as shown here precisely because such comparisons higlight the differences between the two, not how they are similar. The real world doesn't work that way... I'm no lawyer but wouldn't want to be on Coke's side of this argument...

IP Address: 75.197.27.143 | Report This Post
On Wednesday, September 24, 2008, Steve said:

They better have some serious cash to pay Coke. There is a precedent case that HVB should have examined before taking this before the courts. Ting a Jamaican drink was sued by the makers of Tang along similar grounds. Tang lost. HVB you were badly served by your lawyers.

IP Address: 63.17.181.152 | Report This Post
On Thursday, September 25, 2008, McConnell said:

Not so fast, Jamey --- size has nothing to do with this legal dogfight. Trademark laws exist to help protect the entrepreneur, the little guy, the individual inventor and, yes, even the HUGE company that first staked their claim at the trademark office. Since VOLT was on the register way before BEFORE Coke ever came out with Vault, that gives VOLT something called "priority rights". It will be tough to overcome that legal hurdle if you are COKE. As long as HVB wasn't just laying in the bushes for a decade with a sniper rifle waiting to shoot at some careless -- or just plain dumb -- trademark violator, VOLT will win this one. (My bet, anyway! Googling "Volt drinks" shows me that they're the real McCoy and not just warehousing their trademark!) Yea, they're small but so was Vitamin Water 8 years ago.

Anyway glad to see someone in this biz has the balls (or insanity?) to take on the BIG RED ONE.

volt vault volt vault. Yea, sounds like a bit of confusion going on to my way of thinking.

You and I may differ on how we view this, but eventually a jury of waitresses, truck drivers, accountants, teachers and/or unemployed folks will decide what's confusing and what isn't.

IP Address: 170.170.59.139 | Report This Post
On Wednesday, October 01, 2008, bob said:

This is ridiculous. Vault is named after a type of toilet, nothing at all related to energy.

IP Address: 12.86.107.34 | Report This Post
Leave a Comment
Name (required)
Email (required but will not be published)
Please note: All comments are reviewed prior to posting. Attempts to advertise, solicit, or promote will not be approved.
Email me when someone else comments on this article.







Classified Ads

+ Post an Ad

Headlines

 Industry News

+ Submit News

 Image Submissions


BAWLS Gu...
11/18/08

XO Energ...
11/18/08

MaSo
11/17/08

SoNu Water
11/16/08

Deep Thr...
11/14/08

XO Energ...
11/14/08

MaSo
11/14/08

Rip It E...
11/14/08
View All
Upload Image